When we talk to many people and when we spend time in the media and television we can see that many times, the meaning for the word science has become synonymous with evolution. I wonder who gave this interpretation to the word science as when we look at the dictionary, we found that the meaning of the word science equals knowledge .
Science is anything which has to do with knowledge. And not just an idea, but something someone can 1 Prove 2 Test 3 Demonstrate . What is creation It is true that the creation story cannot be seen with eyes, but neither can someone see the big bang happen. Is there a video about the big bang. Or a picture? No.
Is there a movie showing the big bang in action? Additionally a picture? No. Essentially for the explanation for why that the universe is expanding which the exact same thing written in the Bible saying that the universe would expand after the creation. Then progression scientists set that this growth has as a rule happened since billions of years. In any case this is not science, as it is remarkably unrealistic to show that the universe is more than 6000 years old !
In the battle between evolution vs creation and creationism we see that the oldest reef in the world is only 4000 years old, dating back from the flood. Why is that is the earth has been around billions of years? This comes from the Australian government who measured at which rate the great barrier reef grows, and found out this reef is only 4000 years old. Sounds like creationism is right!
Finding out the truth about evolution vs creation, measuring the rate of sediment deposit in deltas, we find that the oldest deltas in the world are only 4000 years old. Why is that is the earth has been around billions of years ago? Evolution vs creation we also find that the oldest tre is only 4000 years old. Why is that if the earth has been around billions of years? Looks like creationism is right
In this monumental debate which is evolution vs creation we found out that. Science was not invented by Darwin. In fact most branches of science have been started by creationists. Would you consider Newton, Pascal, Pasteur, Mendel to be religious men or scientists? I urge you to examine further this important issue. Evolution vs creation.
Science is anything which has to do with knowledge. And not just an idea, but something someone can 1 Prove 2 Test 3 Demonstrate . What is creation It is true that the creation story cannot be seen with eyes, but neither can someone see the big bang happen. Is there a video about the big bang. Or a picture? No.
Is there a movie showing the big bang in action? Additionally a picture? No. Essentially for the explanation for why that the universe is expanding which the exact same thing written in the Bible saying that the universe would expand after the creation. Then progression scientists set that this growth has as a rule happened since billions of years. In any case this is not science, as it is remarkably unrealistic to show that the universe is more than 6000 years old !
In the battle between evolution vs creation and creationism we see that the oldest reef in the world is only 4000 years old, dating back from the flood. Why is that is the earth has been around billions of years? This comes from the Australian government who measured at which rate the great barrier reef grows, and found out this reef is only 4000 years old. Sounds like creationism is right!
Finding out the truth about evolution vs creation, measuring the rate of sediment deposit in deltas, we find that the oldest deltas in the world are only 4000 years old. Why is that is the earth has been around billions of years ago? Evolution vs creation we also find that the oldest tre is only 4000 years old. Why is that if the earth has been around billions of years? Looks like creationism is right
In this monumental debate which is evolution vs creation we found out that. Science was not invented by Darwin. In fact most branches of science have been started by creationists. Would you consider Newton, Pascal, Pasteur, Mendel to be religious men or scientists? I urge you to examine further this important issue. Evolution vs creation.
No comments:
Post a Comment